The Online Genealogist

John Brugliera

Genealogical Guffaws & Ha-Ha History

Time once again for The Online Genealogist to dip into his bag of garba- er, TRICKS and bring you the “best” and “funniest” items you will ever “see”!  Gotta love the quotes; no disclaimer required!

For you newbie readers of this garba- er, BLOG, that would be any family history-related tidbit found in print, such as newspapers and city directories.  But mostly, newspapers and city directories.  Most anything that fits into the “Ya just can’t make this up and if you did; why would you want to?” category.

And newspaper marriage combos are my favorites!  I could be so lucky to find most humorous pairings like STRAW-HOUSE, MOORE-RONN or KNOTT-PFUNNIE; so instead, you get this garba- STUFF!  From the Brooklyn Daily Eagle

Bklyn Eagle 18600810a Church-Church

Two Churches married by a Rev. Bell… in a church!

Not living up to his name…

Bklyn Eagle 18600801a Elder

…and an oxymoronic exit from this earth…

Bklyn Eagle 19260127 Lively death

Ah, yes – a Lively death.

On the flip side, here’s a boring couple for ya…

Bklyn Eagle 18601201a Moore-Knapp

They’re a hit a parties!  Zzzzzzz.

Besides the splotchy print, what is wrong with this marriage announcement?

Bklyn Eagle 18610520a Doherty-Rev. Pise

Score 50 points if you answered “Wait a minute!… Who’s gettin’ married here??”

Fortunately, it was corrected the next day.

Bklyn Eagle 18610521a Doherty-O'Donnell

…after a lengthy tongue-lashing from the furious bride, I’m sure!

Well, well, well…

Bklyn Eagle 18620307a Crowell-Cornwell

Many confusing introductions at THAT reception.  Ya think??

Is this a marriage or chess commentary?!?

Bklyn Eagle 18700203a Bishop-Trappall

Of course, BISHOP-KNIGHT would’ve been funnier.  Though maybe not for Miss Owatta Knight.

This is probably more common than you’d think…

Bklyn Eagle 18620528a Walsh-Walters

…marrying the girl that sat behind you in school!

What’s worse than two families flipping out, worrying about the upcoming marriage?

Bklyn Eagle 18600906a McFarland-Ashfield(x2)

…having to go through that hell, times two!!

Jeez, the McFarlands and Ashfields took up so much room that last newlyweds Arnold and Amaret were left with SQUAT!

Not looking for Lois and Clark; but super, man.

Bklyn Eagle 18700429a Kent-Lane

From the 1915 (!) Lebanon, NH city directory, it’s not Sam Carpenter, house-builder, but…

Directory Lebanon 1915 175a

Staying in Lebanon, but this coming from the Granite State Free Press.

GSFP 19420914 01a

We can only hope!

Here’s another “Fire the ad agency!!”-worthy ad in the Norwich Bulletin

Norwich Bulletin 19141113 07a

See comment below barber Pat… above.

It’s May 18, 1861 and this Bangor Daily Whig ad says Uncle Sam is NOT looking for soldiers to sign up for the barely-started Civil War.

Bangor Daily Whig 18610518 02a

“You’ll never see combat!  Only fifes and/or drums!!”  Yeah, riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

And the typesetter is getting a little tipsy at the Omaha Daily Bee

Omaha Bee 19150612 18a Crooked Type

Oh, today’s e-editors have NO idea.

Should you be worried if your newspaper editor may also be QUACKING?  From the Bradford page in an 1858 Vermont atlas…

Dr. Editor Mann

Voodoo doctor?  Super, Mann!

Even so, sounds better than his colleague Dr. Farr; a mechanical dentist.  I can hear the machinery nearing a patient’s mouth now.  Oh, the screams.

And the July 19, 1856 issue of the Boston Transcript shows that it was NOT a good day to be a George Russell in New England.

Boston Transcript 18560719a

And so ends this Ancestry.com-free blog posting!!!

JohnBrugliera@theonlinegenealogist.com

TOG WEB

The Online Genealogist questions Annecestrees* answer

No, I’m not aiming towards an Ancestry.com mutiny with this recent run of posts; it just so happens that they’re so HUGE and have SO much going on!  And as I will point out, it’s a double-edged sword.

Check this out…

Ask Anne

Ahhh, yes.  This is the genealogical equivalent to a debate on religion or politics.  There are some strong opinions out there, for sure.  Foreshadow, foreshadow…  And check out the pages and pages of comments!  Which I will read AFTER this post.

I fully agree with Ancestry Anne’s answer… to a point.  You just knew that was coming, eh?  If you’re the number one genealogical website, shouldn’t there be some types of *gasp* standards set for the massive amount of Public Member Trees (PMTs) they host under their Ancestry.com name?

I can’t go merrily updating James Brown‘s Wikipedia page claiming that he has risen from the dead and will be appearing for a limited engagement at Bellagio’s poorly-named O Theater in Vegas.  Wikipedia won’t allow me to do that!

Why do we use Wikipedia?  Because, overall, it is the most reliable encyclopedia of EVERYTHING; because they have standards.  Why doesn’t Ancestry.com have the same mentality when it comes to their PMTs?  Huh, Anne??

Ancestry has no checks and balances when it comes to the “factual” information their members are adding to their trees.  Heck, I could totally manufacture a tree on there.  I’d link existing families to other non-related families; what’s to stop me? Or create a completely ridiculous, totally fabricated member tree; like so…

X-Men

But who should I be: Fantomex or Shard?  Hmmmmmmmm…  Yes, some would suggest Bird-Brain – heh.

OK, a show of hands…  How many of you clicked on one of the three hyperlinks, bringing you to their Wiki page?  Come on, admit it – when you did see it was Wikipedia, was there an immediate sense of relief because you KNEW that the information on their website was probably 99.999999% accurate?

Now, if you tried to post erroneous info on Wolverine‘s Wiki page, rabid fans would be looking for a bounty on your head!  But what if the X-Men links led to a “legitimate” Ancestry.com Public Member Tree?  Would your confidence level for Ancestry be comparable to that of Wikipedia’s; or more towards their “leftover” .000001%?

Don’t get me wrong, Ancestry.com is usually the first site I hit for family history research.  But when it comes to their PMTs, I was already following Ancestry Anne’s suggestion of having little trust for the information provided on “her” website.  OK, that’s not quite how she put it, but in so many words…

Did Anne’s watered-down quasi-excuse address any of these issues?  Heck, no!  It’s Ancestry’s 800-pound pink hot potato in the room.  Huh?!?  “Since we can’t control how accurate our PMT info is, we’ll wash our hands of it and say ‘You’re on your own!'”.  Think you’d see anything like that from Wikipedia?

“We’ll return to The Online Genealogist’s post in just a moment; right after this timely semi-related chuckle…”

MAD

Granted, many Ancestry Public Member Trees are fantastic; wonderfully documented timelines with viewable source images included for all to see.  But those are the exceptions and not the rule.  Tell me again, why isn’t ANY kind of proof a requirement to add a “fact”?  Have the PMT “lunatics” taken over the “asylum”?

I feel as if I’m beating a dead horse, as I know this has been a major bone-of-contention for long-time Ancestry subscribers.  Most of who would’ve never included so many bad clichés in one blog post.  Then again, maybe we DO need to yell our heads off so the PMT Dept. can hear us!

So, Ancestry Anne – if there’s even such a person – did you have to bite your tongue… uhhhhhh, bite your FINGERS, while replying to “Vicki”?

Ancestry – you expect the gazillion documents in your collection to be accurate and reliable; why not the similar high-quality standards for your PMTs?  I know of several members who have brought this issue to your attention with specific examples, yet to see no resolution.

And, no, I refuse to play the New Membership Trumps Public Member Tree Accuracy card.  Doesn’t even need to go there.  Or did I just inadvertently use it by saying I wasn’t going to??

Example

Here’s a typical scenario:  In comes a new (free) Ancestry.com member.  She adds her known family information and receives several “shaky leaf” hints.  Unknowingly, she attaches herself to an erroneous PMT, which propagates further as it shows up in other members’ hints; repeatedly… “Wow!  I found a bunch of new relatives!  Where do I join?”

So, again – Anne’s advice is sound and should be heeded, but with the above added caveat lector, emptor, venditor and a bunch of other Latin words.  Tiny  Jeez, I’d be completely lost without the internet.

Time for Ancestry.com to roll out their new PMTs slogan?… “Don’t fully trust our Public Member Trees; just use them like really good hints!”  OK, so it could use a bit of tweakage.

Now to spend a few hours reading this post’s 127 comments accumulated over the past 12 days…  I’m surely not the only one to bring up these issues.

And here’s hoping you never receive a shaky leaf for your newest “relative”, Fantomex!

* combo of Ancestry Anne, Ancestry.com Public Member Trees (PMTs) a.k.a. “Ancestry’s Trees”.  Which I realize should be Tiny

 

JohnBrugliera@theonlinegenealogist.com

TOG WEB

 

 

Just in case you have a few billion dollars kickin’ around

Big news of the day is that Ancestry.com is pondering a sale of their website.

Two people talk at the Ancestry.com booth at the Rootstech Conference sponsored by Family Search in Salt Lake City, Utah February 7, 2014 REUTERS/George Frey

Two people talk at the Ancestry.com booth at the Rootstech Conference sponsored by Family Search in Salt Lake City, Utah February 7, 2014 REUTERS/George Frey

Hell, if I had the money, I’d put in a bid!  Better yet – why don’t subscribers pool their funds to buy it?  Owner benefits would include a free lifetime World Explorer Plus membership!

Going in another direction, what if the LDS folks snatched it up?  Combining Ancestry.com with FamilySearch.org would be HUGE.  Sure, there’s much overlap; but each offer their own great collections of exclusive information.  And both have already been partnering with other major genealogical websites!

I would have NO problem with paying for a subscription to AncestryFamilySearch.com.  That “extra” money would go towards the acceleration of LDS’s digitizing microfilm for online databases; a massive undertaking.  How incredible would THAT be??

Yes, many would yell “Monopoly!”, but don’t these two websites, the TOP TWO of 2015 (and located less than an hour’s drive of each other!), combine to be a sort of monopoly anyway?  And what would be wrong with that??

aFS

Logo courtesy of Ancestry.com and FamilySearch.org and Photoshop and John B.

Finding the majority of your sources on AFS.com would surely make online research just that much easier.

Yes, it’s always nice to imagine the possibilities.

 

 

JohnBrugliera@theonlinegenealogist.com

TOG WEB

 

 

The Online Genealogist is going to Master Genealogical Proof!

Yes, I’ve taken the plunge and joined DearMyrtle’s MGP3 Study Group.

MGPStudyGroup3

As you’ve probably deduced, this is the THIRD such study group for ol’ Myrt and Cousin Russ*.  You think they’d be the ULTIMATE masters at this by now!  As I’m sure Cousin Russ will say, “You always learn something new each time you go through this book’s exercises”.  OK, so I already viewed some of MGP1 and MGP2 – heh.

So, as an already-established professional genealogist, why am I taking this excellent online study group?  Because I want my name to be John Brugliera, CG (Certified Genealogist)!

Actually, when my genealogy trek began in 1988, there was NO book like this at all, so it was mostly “learn as you go” with much trial and error.  So, now that there’s an agreed-upon standardized methodology for collecting data, reviewing records and drawing a convincing conclusion for each genealogical answer you’re attempting to to prove, I may as well learn to do it RIGHT.  Which I haven’t been fully doing all these years.

While I would usually eventually get the research results I was looking for, it was often by going the long way ’round.  What?!?  There’s a more structured way to DO this stuff??

Bugs

Good thing, as I find this “academic” side of genealogy the most challenging; so attending MGP3 will greatly assist me with that.  I had known all of the pieces, but not how to implement them properly.

I just finished reading the book, but to learn by DOING and to discuss it amongst your peers is a priceless opportunity.  I’m so glad I went for it!

It’s also a rare setting for me, forever battling social issues.  Like having more success with dead people than I do LIVE ones.  More on that later (so that I don’t psych myself out)…

Well, here goes nuthin’!…

 

JohnBrugliera@theonlinegenealogist.com

TOG WEB

 

* Myrt’s very own personal Wizard of Oz.  Minus the curtain.

Came across this chuckle-worthy stone on Find-A-Grave

Spatially-Challenged

Old maps RULE!!!!

NH Map Long before delving into family history research, I was a cartography junkie.  I could read a map like a “See Dick Run” book at a very early age.  I’d often go pretend-driving along various roads and highways, usually with no destination in mind.  “Go left here, take the next right on US 6…”. Anyway, I was just checking out some late 1800s maps – the ones that list owners, residents, etc.  It never fails that I always find something that gives me a chuckle or makes me scratch my head and go “Wha?????” Like this…

Rocky-RookyIn Wentworth, NH, there’s Rocky Pond and Rooky Brook — which is it??  I’d have to guess Rocky, unless the brook is a green newbie – heh.

Then there are the various names on these maps.  In keeping with the rocky theme, we have this pairing in Sullivan, NH…

Stone Mason

I wonder if these neighbors had a good laugh on that one!

Here’s another combo in Winchester, NH; sort of weather-related…

Willard Scott

Now THESE two neighbors had no idea at the time!

Speaking of weather, looks like some low morning clouds in East Alstead, NH…

A.M.Fogg

His name, of course, being something like Alexander Melvin Fogg, as these maps mainly used initials for first and middle names.

So, any Irving Benjamin [SURNAME] would show as…

I.B.Ham

“Yes, I.B. Ham from Haverhill, NH!”

But don’t hold your breath…

N.HaleI couldn’t find his brother Xavier Hale anywhere in Westmoreland, NH – har, har, har!

First name Charles, Clifford or Christopher?  Doesn’t matter, as he was in Keene, NH long before any type of lasers…

C.DeeAnd another musical “C” in nearby Chesterfield, NH…

C.Miner

B. Sharpe and D. Flatt can’t be far behind!

And not at Kitty Hawk, but North Haverhill, NH…

WrightBros

Meanwhile, further south in Winchester, NH, some possible cousins?…

Wright Place

Dr. John!  Wright Place, Rong Time!

In about 25 years, this would’ve been an awkward neighborhood.

Ford & Dodge

And a tip of the hat to Mr. Stanley above these two, whose Steamer was around just a few years prior to these two familiar nameplates.

In Bradford, VT, not a Lowe’s, but a…

Lows

And these in East Enfield, NH I found to be quite baffling…

Enfield Summer Residence

To the left, there’s “Hon. J. Jonson Fam”, which I’m assuming to be “family”, but what’s that to the right?  Same thing, but followed by some garbled abbreviations.  Summer residence??

If so, does the family cross the street in the summer to live there?  That would be silly.  But I need to KNOW these things!!!

And a final map page we’ll categorize under “What’s wrong with this picture?”

So.Stoddard

The first question I had was “What is South Stoddard, NH doing in northeast Stoddard?!?”  That is, until I saw the NORTH arrow below the map.  Ahhhhhhhhhhh.

And if you’re having trouble finding your way through your family history, hire ME – The Online Genealogist!!

JohnBrugliera@theonlinegenealogist.com

TOG WEB

Finding Your Roots… and twigs and branches and leaves and bark…

FYR 02

Nice interview with Henry Louis Gates, Jr. in the Fall 2014 edition of NEHGS’ American Ancestors magazine.

FYR 01

The great news is that PBS, Ancestry (main sponsor), New England Historical Genealogical Society (main researchers) have agreed to do another three seasons of his Finding Your Roots!  They’ve already got dozens of guests chosen and confirmed.

While I have a few issues with the show (research “shortcuts”, effect on professional clients’ expectations), I find it extremely interesting and well done.  I’ve learned a lot, a good chunk to do with DNA.  We’re even much more mixed up than I originally thought!

You’d surmise that a former programmer such as myself would have no problem understanding all of that, but not so.  Programming is structured while DNA as a whole seems abstract in comparison.  The DNA itself is obviously structured, but the interpretation…

Actually, genealogy and computer programming are similar in many ways.  The debugging of programs highly resembles attacking a genealogical brick wall. 

Mr. Gates also said that NONE of his guests regretted discovering their ancestry OR were sorry they were on the show.  He was being very modest here, as I’m sure MOST of the guests have been affected quite profoundly by their experience.

Said Gates, “It’s been very rewarding.  It makes me feel like Santa Claus, like I’m making it Christmas every day for the people lucky enough to be chosen as guests…”.

Researchers also feel that way upon finding a long-hidden genealogical gem.  When we DON’T, it’s time to hang up the RootsMagic and try crocheting or stamp collecting.

You can check out Season Two episodes here…

FYR 03

Yep, just like unwrapping a present from “Skip”; as he is often referred to in the interview by NEHGS President Brenton Simons.  They even did it where some of the show takes place – in NEGHS’ Treat Rotunda, which I’ve yet to visit.  Because I’m usually running right to their manuscripts, microfilm or books!

I’m sure the main rush of being on the show is getting that ancestral information – all at once!  As researchers, we tend to unwrap a number of small presents over a period of time, while Mr. Gates’ guests open up a giant one during the one-hour show!

Anyway, props to “Finding Your Roots” and the informative American Ancestors article.  Henry Louis Gates, Jr. seems like a guy you could just hang out with, chatting for hours about genealogy.

And I’m still working on the concept of an Instant Connections game show, mentioned in my last post.  It’ll be a combo of Love Connection, Joker’s Wild, Name That Tune and instant oatmeal.  Uh, for the instant part.  No takers yet, but give it time.  I’ve got 11 years!

Well, if I can’t create game shows, I CAN research your family history, as I am… The Online Genealogist!!

JohnBrugliera@theonlinegenealogist.com

TOG WEB

The Online Genealogist is thankful for… online genealogy!!

OG 01

When I began my family history research in 1989 and someone told me I’d be The Online Genealogist in 2014, I’d reply with “On WHAT line?  My paternal or maternal??

Boy, have we come a long way in 25 years!  When historians look back on genealogy as a whole, there’s probably NO other quarter-century period where SO much has changed.  I say for the better, but others mainly those stubborn non-technical types wouldn’t be so quick to jump up and down in excitement for online genealogy and what’s in store for the future.

OG 02

So I thought now would be the perfect time to compare family history research, then (1989), now (2014) and in the future.  Remember that old song In The Year 2525?  Well, we won’t go THAT far ahead… How about 2025?  Which, of course, would be all speculation on my part.

OG 03

Then:  The majority of genealogical research is conducted in libraries.

Now:  A large percentage of genealogical research can be conducted via the internet.

Future:  The MAJORITY of genealogical research can be conducted via the internet.

Then:  The research you’re undertaking is heavily dictated by what repositories you can physically visit and when.  You’re at the mercy of the hours they’re open and when you can get there.

Now:  The research you’re undertaking is heavily dictated by the research path you’re following online – 24/7.  A MUCH more natural and efficient way to conduct ANY type of research!.  The “old” method is seriously backwards and counter-intuitive.  Instead of going with the flow, you’re often swimming upstream; researching what you can where you’re at when you can.

Future:  Even more “now” research and less “then”, which is inefficient and “highly illogical”.  Thank you Mr. Spock!

OG 04

Then:  A specific research plan can take weeks – even MONTHS – to complete.

Now:  A specific research plan can take a few hours – even MINUTES – to complete.

Future:  A specific research plan can take minutes – even SECONDS – to complete.  OK, so that’s a bit of an exaggeration, but you surely get the gist.

Then:  Roots.

Now:  Who Do You Think You Are?, Finding Your Roots, Who’s In My Line?

Future:  Instant Connections, Ancestral Challenge, Genealogy Update.

OG 05

Then:  Hours and hours are spent traveling to and from each research repository.  Which adds up to dollars and DOLLARS.

Now:  You only travel for research if you can’t find what you’re looking for online.  And more often than not, you won’t be leaving your chair.

Future:  You only travel for research if you absolutely MUST.  More will be found online, thus less time spent in your car or on a plane.

OG 06

Then:  You’re overwhelmed with paper copies.

Now:  You’re overwhelmed by all the original records online.

Future:  You’re overwhelmed by immediate access to ANYTHING and EVERYTHING genealogy.

Then:  You need to make the most of your library visits; often working on several ancestors at once.  See counter-intuitive above.

Now:  You can research your ancestors ONE AT A TIME online.  Which is 100 times more productive and a whole lot less confusing.

Future:  You’ll research your one ancestor with much more ease and less mouse clicks.

OG 07

Then:  You either transcribe a document or make a paper copy of it.

Now:  You either download an image of a record or physically take a digital photograph of it.

Future:  99% digital, bay-bee!

Then:  Correspondence is mainly done via the United States Postal Service.  You can expect a reply in maybe a month or two.

Now:  Correspondence is mainly done via email.  You can expect a reply in maybe a week or two at the most.

Future:  Less and less correspondence will be required, with the immense amount of online offerings available.

OG 08

Then:  NOTHING is online because there IS no online!

Now:  5% of genealogical records are online.  Pffffft!

Future:  More than 6% of genealogical records are online.  Heh.

Then:  DNA is unreliable and not accepted as evidence in court.

Now:  DNA is heavily used in our justice system as well as for genealogical research.

Future:  More and more people will have their DNA tested, thus making it a more reliable and essential research tool.

OG 09

Then:  An Everton’s Genealogical Helper subscription is a MUST-HAVE.

Now:  An ancestry.com subscription is a MUST-HAVE.

Future:  An All-Access Online Genealogy subscription is a MUST-HAVE.

Then:  “Dear local genealogical society…”

Now:  Dear Myrtle!

Future:  “Dear XJ-1B Automated Genealogy Assistant, please locate for me…”

OG 10

Then:  “I found dozens of ancestors!  But it took me an entire YEAR.”

Now:  “I found hundreds of ancestors!!  In just a few months.”

Future:  “I found THOUSANDS of ancestors!!!  In a non-stop two-week online marathon session!”

Then:  Contacting and connecting to newly-found living relatives can be a chore.

Now:  Ancestry.com shaky-leaf hints, Facebook, email, Skype, etc.

Future:  ?????

OG 11

So, as you can see, I am VERY optimistic regarding the future of genealogical research; especially online.  The speed and sheer numbers of digital records being added DAILY is mind-boggling.

In this day and age, those not embracing all this technology are at a serious disadvantage.  Even if you visit a repository in person, the first thing they’ll have you do is get onto one of their computers to access what they’re already offering online anyway.  So, there’s no excuse NOT to be keeping up with the times and taking full advantage of EVERYTHING online research has to offer!!

OG 12

Then:  The Yugo.

Now:  The Prius.

Future:  Flying cars!!!

Eh, there’s hope yet…

 

Then:  John Brugliera, Genealogist.  Zero clients.

Now:  The Online Genealogist.  Several clients.

Future:  The Online Genealogist Co., Inc.  Hundreds of clients!!

JohnBrugliera@theonlinegenealogist.com

TOG WEB

The Online Genealogist asks “How do you find her maiden name?”

Maiden Name 01First off, many thanks to MAD’s Al Jaffee for the above extreme, but fitting image.  Found elsewhere online, uncredited.  I’d recognize his drawing style anywhere.

One of the most challenging aspects of genealogical research is discovering the maiden name of a female ancestor.  How many times have we seen a compiled family history, with entries such as this?…

Maiden Name 02

Yes, the dreaded blank line after the young lady’s given name.  Even esteemed genealogical societies’ published family histories aren’t immune.  In fact, it’s more surprising if ALL maiden names were known.  Why is that?  Several reasons, but near the top would surely be the lack of female records in general.  The overwhelming majority of early records feature men, men, men, men…

It was glaringly apparent in those Lebanon, NH town records I was looking at last week.  There may be an occasional “widow Reynolds” mentioned in a new road survey or “Sally McNeil” in the town poor house, but 99% of the names in there are William, Daniel, Thomas, Ziba or some other equally manly moniker.

One of the best ways I’ve found maiden names are through the Federal Census records – mainly 1850 and on when all members of a household are listed as opposed to the head only (MAN) that was there in 1840 and before.  The most recent censuses are even better.  “How so?”, you ask?  “How about an example?”, I answer.  Here’s one from the 1930 Federal Census…

Maiden Name 03

Any guesses for what the wife of Peter Gioia, Pauline’s maiden name is?  Score 1000 points if you yell “Messina!  Messina!  Messina!!!”  I’ve found SO many maiden names in this manner.  It could be a maternal nephew or bonus multiple in-laws, as in the above Boston snippage.  The maiden name is right there!

And if you’re looking at 1850, 1860 or 1870 , where the relationship to the head of household wasn’t included, no need to fret!  If I see an older Mrs. Wilson living with a Richardson family, I’ll most definitely be looking at Wilsons in the area as possible/probable parents for Mrs. Richardson, which of course, would provide her maiden name.

Other great maiden name hints?  Middle names!  Oh, and OBITS!!  But those are whole other posts…

 

If you’re looking for a hard-to-find maiden name, you’ll find that I may find out what that is.   I’m the Online Genealogist!

JohnBrugliera@theonlinegenealogist.com

TOG WEB

 

 

Great genealogy information and unique history snapshots are found in town records!

 

Leb Town Records 01
FamilySearch’s impressive online town records collection comes in very handy when looking for earlier vital records, town meetings, warnings out, etc.   As most volumes are NOT indexed by FS, you’ll need to browse and manually hunt down what genealogy items you are looking for.  Although many of the “physical” books DO contain varying indexes within.

I also find that reading through these town records provides an interesting picture of what life was like some 200+ years ago in a particular area.  Even more fascinating is when they’re your town records.

For instance, I can’t imagine Lebanon, NH bringing up these items during a recent meeting.

Leb Town Records 02

I’ve been living here for over 12 years and I have yet to see any swine running around loose on the streets.   And the punishment for stray piggies?

Lebanon Town Recs v.1 075

Talk about government pork – quite literally!  Also in The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same Dept…

Lebanon Town Recs v.1 002

Let’s meet to specifically dismiss the meeting – yes!!  Or better yet…

Lebanon Town Recs v.1 004

What?  A government getting NOTHING DONE?!?  Nah!  Can’t happen!  OK, I’ll try and dial the sarcasm down some.

But when they DO get some work done, it comes out like this.

Lebanon Town Recs v.1 007

These nine lines could easily be whittled down to three.  But not by the government.  I’d think using such big words back in 1768 would more likely “discommode the inhabitants”.

Also within Lebanon’s town records are road surveys, which are impossible to use now.

Leb Town Records 04

Lots of long-gone trees and rock piles!

Here’s another challenging item brought up in one of the meetings…

Leb Town Records 03

I’m guessing this pre-dates the first town library, as that would surely be the job of the head librarian.  Then again, if they had a library, this wouldn’t be an issue!

They could also use the library for a good dictionary or two.

Lebanon Town Recs v.1 025

Though it looks rather  intentional.  A Town Clerk doubling as the County Comedian? 

Lebanon Town Recs v.1 006

So, who Wood have thunk that town records would contain so much neat stuff??

 

I did, but I’m The Online Genealogist!!  Hire me as I have NO problem delving into town records!

JohnBrugliera@theonlinegenealogist.com

TOG WEB

 

Post Navigation